Pintu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5479 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2017 Thana- MATIHANI DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Pintu Singh aged about 35 years (Male), son of Devnanddan Singh Resident of Village- Mahdouli, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 195 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusations of having fired on the deceased is upon co-accused Golu Singh and Raman Singh. The only accusation against the petitioner is that he tried to catch hold the informant unsuccessfully. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5479 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Juned Alam, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 195 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T