Ajit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7586 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ajit Yadav S/O- Shiv Ji Singh R/O- Village- Karan, P.S.- Baghaila, Dist.- Rohtas At Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chhotelal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret information, patrolling party became active and intercepted a swift Dezire car. Two accused persons on seeing the police party, started to run but on chase both were apprehended on spot. On search, a country made loaded pistol, 9 live cartridges and nokia mobile were recovered from the waist of co-accused Ravi Ranjan. From possession of the petitioner one loaded country made pistol with seven live cartridges and a nokia mobile were recovered. Nothing was recovered from Swift
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 7586 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/3 Dexire Car.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. FIR was registered against unknown. Petitioner and co-accused Ravi Ranjan Singh, were arrested by the police in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 100/2023, and on the basis of their self confessional statement, they were made accused in the present case also. Neither the petitioner is named in the FIR not put on TIP. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. No looted articles of the informant were recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.4.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is a habitual offender and 11 cases of like nature are pending against him.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Juidicial Magistrate,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 7586 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 3/3 Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 99 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U