← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10397/2017disposed

Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-17Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10397 of 2017 =========================================================== Nagendra Singh Son of Late Bir Bahadur Singh, Resident of Village- Sawan Bigrah, P.O. Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

3. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar, District- Chapra.

4. The Vice- Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

5. The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash Officer, Chapra.

6. Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Registrar, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. The Registrar, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

8. The Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

9. The Registrar Jai Prakash University, Chapra. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and J.P. University. Nobody appears on behalf of B.R.A. Bihar University.

2. From the materials on record, it appears that all admissible dues of the petitioner have been paid except Gratuity and reimbursement amount of Earned leave.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the J.P. University submitted that though the requisition has been sent to the Government for release of fund but as per the instructions, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10397 of 2017 dt.17-02-2018 2/2 amount would be paid to him within one month.

4. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with the observation that the J.P. University would live up to its commitment and pay the aforesaid amount to the petitioner within one month. As the order has been passed on the basis of commitment made to the Court by learned counsel for the J.P. University, the Court would indicate that the J.P. University shall not give any occasion to the Court in future for the matter to be brought before it alleging non compliance of the same. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U