Md. Firoz @ Md. Firoz Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5480 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== MD. FIROZ @ MD. FIROZ MANSOORI s/o Md. Rajjak Mansoori R/o Village- Ramayee, Ghoraghat, Ward no. 2, P.S.- Forbesganj, Distt- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rabina Khatoon W/o Md. Firoz @ Md. Firoz Mansoori, D/o Md. Farooque, R/o Village- Ramayee, Ghoraghat, Ward no. 2, P.S.- Forbesganj, DisttAraria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 342 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act. The allegation against the petitioner and others is of trying to kill the informant by setting her on fire because they further demanding of Rs. Five Lakhs and a milking buffalo as dowry.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner is the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5480 of 2023(2) dt.10-04-2023 2/2 husband of the informant. He submitted that the petitioner has neither demanded anything from the informant nor tortured his wife ever before. In fact, petitioner is still ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity as asserted in para- 12 of the petition, but the informant does not want to lead the conjugal life with the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 17.11.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Araria Mahila P.S. Case No. 93 of 2021.

However, trial Court is directed to make all efforts to settle the dispute between the parties.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T