Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13430/2015rejected

Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-25Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13430 of 2015 (3) dt.25-06-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13430 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2012 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Sharma S/o Late Suresh Sharma, R/o VillChakabal, P.s. - Barauni, Dist- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Narsing Tanti(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 25.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner remained in jail custody for near about two years in a case in which he killed his own daughter. It appears from perusal of report of Addl. Sessions Judge V, Begusarai that up till now, three prosecution witnesses could be examined.

However, taking note of the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions trial no. 763/2013 arising out of Barauni P.S. case no.167/2012 pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge V, Begusarai stands rejected. The learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within seven months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13430 of 2015 (3) dt.25-06-2015 for bail before trial court itself.

Let a copy of this order be sent to Superintendent of Police, Begusarai with direction to him to ensure presence of remaining prosecution witnesses before the trial court so-that trial court could conclude the trial of the petitioner within the time framed by this court.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T