Patna High CourtMJC/2728/2017dismissed

Awadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-15Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2728 of 2017 ====================================================== Awadhesh Kumar, Son of Late Laxuman Singh, resident of Village- Arap, P.S. Vikram, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Deputy Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Patna.

5. The Chairman, Management Committee, Maina Kunwar Rozgarunmukhi Girls High School, Arap, Vikram, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Management Committee, Maina Kunwar, Rozgarunmukhi Girls High School, Arap, Vikram.

7. The Head Master, Maina Kunwar Rozgarunmukhi Girls High School, Arap, Vikram.

8. Geeta Devi, wife of Tiger Ram, R/o Vill. Arap, P.S. - Vikram, Distt. Patna. ... ... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opp. Party/s :

AC to AAG - 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

15-11-2017 The present petition has been filed for restoration of restoration petition i.e. M.J.C. No. 1152 of 2016. The said restoration petition i.e. M.J.C. No. 1152 of 2016 stood dismissed due to non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner on two consecutive dates. The writ petition i.e. C.W.J.C. No. 11594 of 2011 was not dismissed on merit, rather it was dismissed due to non-prosecution.

Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate

Patna High Court MJC No.2728 of 2017(3) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 General - 15, tried to persuade the Court that the reason for his non-appearance in earlier restoration petition was beyond his control.

However, after examining the same, the Court is not persuaded with the ground for restoration of the petition. Accordingly, the present restoration petition, which has been filed for restoration of restoration petition i.e. M.J.C. No. 1152 of 2016, stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T