Shambhu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1752 of 2023 ====================================================== Shambhu Kumar Son of Ramashray Singh Resident of Ward no. 1, Karbaddha Pataili, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Deputy Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4.
The District Assistant Registrar, Samastipur. 5.
The Sub-Registrar, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh For the Respondents :
Mr. Vikash Kumar (SC-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-02-2023 The petitioner is a resident of Ward No. 1, Karbaddha Pataili, under the Police Station Ujiyarpur, DistrictSamastipur. He has filed this writ application, in the nature of public interest litigation, aggrieved by the decision of the State Government to include the area of Ujiyarpur Circle with the office of Sub-Registrar Dalsinghsarai, constituted in exercise of power under Section 5(1) of Registration Act, 1908. It is the main grievance of the petitioner that Dalsinghsarai is nearly 25 Kms away from Ujiyarpur. According to him, had Ujiyarpur Circle been allowed to remain under Samastipur Sub-Registrar
Patna High Court CWJC No.1752 of 2023(2) dt.07-02-2023 2/2 Office, it would have been convenient for the inhabitants of Ujiyarpur Circle.
In our considered opinion, convenience or inconvenience of the nature, as being mentioned by the petitioner, cannot be the basis for the Court to interfere in the matter of establishment of the offices of Sub-Registrar in a Public Interest Litigation proceeding. No interference is warranted in the matter.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Pawan-manish/- U