Chhotu Saw @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20653 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2015 Thana -OBRA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Chhotu Saw @ Chhotu Kumar, son of Late Janki Saw, Resident of VillageSahpur Akhara, P.S.- Aurangabad Town, Dist- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kr.Ranjit Ranjan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 100 of 2015, registered under Sections 311, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is that on 09.10.2015 one person came at the jewellery shop of the informant and introduced himself as Ashokjee and purchased gold chain locket of goddess Durga and silver ornament worth of Rs. 43,000/- and asked the informant to send a person so that he may hand over price after withdrawing the same to the A.T.M. When informant sent a person with that fellow to take money, he moved from there then that person asked the said Nurul Islam to stay near Punjab National Bank and the said person entered inside the bank, but
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20653 of 2016 (2) dt.16-05-2016 2/2 he did not return from the bank. On 10.10.2015 informant identified the petitioner, who had come to purchase the gold locket and silver ornament at Omri pond, thereafter, petitioner has been apprehended.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, petitioner is a hawker and he used to sell fruits on Thela and mere on suspicion he has been implicated in the present case. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 11.10.2015.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Aurangabad in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 100 of 2015 (S.T. No. 82 of 2016/48 of 2016). Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T