Gorelal Das @ Sikander Das @ Sikandra Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8156 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2024 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Gorelal Das @ Sikander Das @ Sikandra Das S/o- Karu Das Village- Jarari Bigha PS-Khizarsarai District- Gaya 2.

Sangita Devi W/o- Gorelal Das @ Sikandra Das @ Sikander Das VillageJarari Bigha PS-Khizarsarai District- Gaya 3.

Renu Devi W/o- Sheokumar Das @ Shiv Kumar Das Village- Jarari Bigha PS-Khizarsarai District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priyadarshi Pankaj Mr. Raj Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115 and 110 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2 and 3 are women and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, on 06.07.2024 at about 5.00 P.M., while he was coming back to his house when he was intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioners and they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8156 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/2 assaulted him. Further, Gorelal Das along with other co-accused members assaulted the informant and his son Bablu Kumar.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR., it would manifest that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with Khizarsari P. S. Case No.255 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T