← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1715/2022dismissed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-12Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1715 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Kumar Son of Jagdish Grain, Resident of Village - Lalbigha, P.O. - Lalbigha, P.S. - Kashichak, District - Nawada. 2.

Subodh Kumar, Son of Ravidra Prasad, Resident of Village - Saidpur, P.O. - Bilari, P.S. - Katrisarai, District - Nalanda. 3.

Sachin Kumar, Son of Umakant Singh, Resident of Village - Kazichak, P.O. -Icchose, P.S. - Islampur, District - Nalanda. 4.

Shailendra Kumar Singh, Son of Alakhdeo Prasad, Resident of Village - Teachers Colony Bangalipur, P.O. - Sheikhpura, P.S. - Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary of Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, of Bihar Technical Service Commission, Harding Road, Patna - 19.

3.

The Chairman, of Bihar Technical Service Commission, Harding Road, Patna - 19.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, Advocate Mr. Bijay Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binod Kr. Yadav, SC 18 Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Adv., BTSC Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners are candidates for recruitment to the post of Occupation Therapist. They had submitted their applications, however, they have not been called for counselling which is stated to have been held on 01.12.2021. In order to appreciate the petitioners' contention the petitioners should have

Patna High Court CWJC No.1715 of 2022(2) dt.12-04-2022 2/2 approached this Court before counselling process is completed. Therefore, at this distance of time, it is not appropriate to direct the concerned authority to counsel the petitioners. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- U