Mohammad Shyan Manzar @ Shyan Manjer @ Shyan Manjar @ Md. Shyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7699 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2025 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Mohammad Shyan Manzar @ Shyan Manjer @ Shyan Manjar @ Md. Shyan S/o Md. Irfan Manzar @ Irfan Manjar R/o Village - Batau Kuwa, P.S - Chowk (Patna City Chowk), District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 111(3), 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66(C) & 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether four ATM cards, out of which three were of different persons, Rs. 10,000/- and a mobile of Realme company were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7699 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that all the FIR is based on the statement of this petitioner, which was given before the police. Save and except the statement of this petitioner, there is nothing against him. Though the informant has booked him in cyber fraud as well, but it is not clear as to whom this petitioner has cheated through cyber fraud. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T