Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11739 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-389 Year-2021 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Ravi Kumar SON OF LATE UAM PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGEURIYANPUR, PS- MANJHI, DIST- SARAN 2.
Bal Keshari Devi WIFE OF LATE UMA PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- URIYANPUR, PS- MANJHI, DIST- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 34 IPC. 3.
Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons have indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side by means of various weapons. 4.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11739 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 injury. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the informant has sustained grievous injury. 6.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering that petitioner no.2 is a female, let the above named petitioner no.2, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.389 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7.
However, considering the nature of injury sustained by the informant, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no.1 on anticipatory bail. The prayer for grant of bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.
8.
This application is accordingly partly allowed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T