Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4955/2025bail rejected

Ram Sundra Singh @ Ram Sundar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4955 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2024 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ram Sundra Singh @ Ram Sundar Singh, S/O Late Ramjit Singh @ Ramji Singh, R/O Village- Bagheji, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No.248 of 2024 dated 27.09.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(B) and (ii)(c) of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per allegation 28.100 Kg. Ganja has been recovered from the house of the petitioner along with two weighing machine, Batkhara of 200 grams, two knives and five Chilams.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the statutory provision of search and seizure has not been followed by the Police. He also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4955 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2 submits that the petitioner is 70 years old.

5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 28.09.2024.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

8. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.

9. Considering the commercial quantity of recovered contraband and the attending circumstances, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

10. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T