Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8879 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Yadav S/O Yaduvir Yadav @ Yaduveer Yadav R/o Vill.- Mahamadpur, P.S.- Bishanpur, District- Darbhanga, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025 Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that when the informant was returning to his rented house, two miscreants boarded on a motorcycle, intercepted the informant and snatched the bag of jewellery, a mobile phone and cash amounting to Rs. 32,000/- on the point of pistol and fled away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8879 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 2/3 transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mahesh Yadav who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 77954 of 2024. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2024 and has four criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8879 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T