← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7277/2025bail rejected

Firoz Kuraishi @ Md. Firoz v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7277 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2024 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Firoz Kuraishi @ Md. Firoz Son of Anwar Kuraishi Resident of Mohalla - Choti Dargah, P.S. and District -Lakhisarai 2.

Pinku Kuraishi Son of Late Mansoor Kuraishi Resident of Mohalla - Choti Dargah, P.S. and District -Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Irshad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State.

2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners who apprehends their arrest in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 557 of 2024 lodged on 02.10.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 223, 271, 292 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with section 11(3) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against 12 named accused persons including the present petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7277 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2 against whom there is an allegation that they were engaged in illegal trade of animal skin bones.

4. After some arguments, Learned Counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present bail application.

5. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected with liberty that if the petitioners surrender before the Trial Court within four weeks, then the Trial Court is directed to pass order on their surrender-cum-bail application on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioners has been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T