Rajeev Singh @ Ram Nivash Singh @ Bullet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20041 of 2016 (4) dt.29-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20041 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -285 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHUBAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Rajeev Singh @ Ram Nivash Singh @ Bullet Singh S/o late Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Basant Jagjivan tole, Gadhwar, PS Purnahia, District Sheohar ..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindeshwar Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhuwan P.S. Case No. 285 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, from mobile number 8877602104 ransom of Rs. 20,00,000/- was demanded on the mobile of the father of the informant and caller stated his name as Manoj Kumar Singh Azad Hind Fauj. During investigation one Raju Singh @ Rajiv Singh was apprehended and he confessing his guilt stated the name of the petitioner as Bullet Singh of Piprahi, District- Sheohar, thereafter, the petitioner has been remanded in this case on 03.09.2015.

Submission is of false implication and that besides the alias name taken by co-accused and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, there is no other material against him and without any fault he is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20041 of 2016 (4) dt.29-06-2016 suffering in custody whereas co-accused Raju Singh @ Rajeev Singh in whose confessional statement name of the petitioner transpired has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 32577 of 2015 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Learned APP submits that the petitioner is involved in 14 cases.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that besides confessional statement and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, at present, there is no other material against him and as such the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sikrahana at Dhaka, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Madhuwan P.S. Case No. 285 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T