Om Prakash Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31209 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2015 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Om Prakash Sharma Son of Mohan Sharma Resident of Village - Khadda, P.S. Nautan, District West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 19-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384 and 386 of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner is to have demanded ransom of Rs.5,00,000/- through mobile.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the father of the petitioner was working under the informant and the informant had withheld the wages of his father for which he had lodged a case before the Labour Officer and the petitioner has requested the informant to pay the dues of wages. The petitioner has been in custody since 8.5.2015. However, after investigation charge-sheet

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31209 of 2015 (2) dt.19-08-2015 2/2 has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in Bettiah Town P. S. Case No. 242 of 2015 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T