← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/996/2017dismissed

Manoj Kumar Rawat @ Manoj Rawat v. District Selection Committee, Jamui Through Its Chairman Cum District Magistrate And ORS

2017-07-26The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.996 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 531 of 2016 =========================================================== Manoj Kumar Rawat @ Manoj Rawat, son of Shoshan Rawat, resident of VillageMalaypur, P.S.-Malaypur, District-Jamui .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. District Selection Committee, Jamui Through Its Chairman Cum District Magistrate

2. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger

4. District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Selection Committee, Jamui

5. Nazarat Deputy Collector, Jamui

6. Superintending Engineer, Road Circle, Road Construction Department, Munger

7. Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Jamui

8. Assistant Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Sub Division, Jamui

9. Assistant Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Sub Division, Sikandra, Jamui .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJ BALABH PD.YADAV-AAG11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 26-07-2017 Inter alia contending that panel of daily wages employees as required under the Bihar Group 'D' (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2009 is not being prepared and consequential benefits not granted to the petitioner, the writ petition was filed and the learned Writ Court has observed that petitioner was discontinued in the service since 2001, hence no direction can be

Patna High Court LPA No.996 of 2017 dt.26-07-2017 2/2 issued. In our considered view, in doing so, learned Writ Court has not committed any error, warranting reconsideration. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01/08/2017 Transmission Date NA