Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4688/2020allowed

Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4688 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-658 Year-2019 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Raushan Kumar, Son of Bhola Paswan, Resident of Mohalla - Moti Pan Gali Mithapur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Special Case No. 8944 of 2019, arising out of Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 658 of 2019, for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 353, 332, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a of the Arms Act and Section 37(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was in drunken condition and shot fire on the police personnel, but no one sustained injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.10.2019.

Considering the fact that no one sustained injury, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4688 of 2020(2) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 8944 of 2019, arising out of Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 658 of 2019 with the following conditions: (a) The bailors should be the family members. (b) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed and extend full co-operation in the trial and the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he fails to appear in the court proceeding for two consecutive dates without any cogent reason.

(c) In the event, the petitioner is found involved in similar case in future, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds in the instant case.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U T