Md. Shivani @ Md. Sehban Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5488 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-879 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Md. Shivani @ Md. Sehban Alam S/O Md. Nasim Resident of village- Naya Nagar, Ward no-1, P.S.- Barrahi O.P., District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338, 353, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that during vehicle checking, this petitioner, along with other co-accused person, dashed the informant, who is a police constable, with his motorcycle due to which he sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5488 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 this case with ulterior motive. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that while the informant was discharging his official duty, in the meantime, this petitioner, who was riding a motorcycle, dashed the informant due to which he sustained injuries.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T