Patna High CourtCWJC/2649/2017disposed

Dwarika Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2649 of 2017 ====================================================== Dwarika Prasad Singh, Son of Late Jagdeep Narain, Retired Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Government of Bihar, Patna, Flat No.22, Phuldeep Bhawan, Arya Samaj Mandir Road, Near Lane No.13, Mohalla- S.K. Puram, North of RPS More, on Bailey Road, P.S. and P.O.- Danapur, District- Patna- 801503.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Principal Secretary, Finance, Govt. of Bihar.

3. Principal Secretary of Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Joint Secretary PHED, Bihar, Patna.

5. Director, GPF, Accounts as Head of GPF, Directorate, Govt. of Bihar, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. Accountant General (A.G.), Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.R. Rahman, AC to GP-24 For Accountant General : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and Accountant General.

In view of the statements made in para 9 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 5, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to file representation before respondent no.5, namely, the Director, GPF, Accounts.

Considering the fair submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2649 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 petitioner to file exhaustive representation meeting the query in terms of para 9 of the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 5, on 03.07.2017. If such representation is filed before respondent no.5 within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, it goes without saying that respondent no.5 will address the grievance raised by the petitioner and will dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of one month and shall ensure payment of all monetary benefits arising out of such decision. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J.) Uday/- U