Manish Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6812 of 2025 Arising out of PS. Case No.-791 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Manish Kumar Gupta Son of Manohar Lal Gupta R/o Adda No.1, Bara Telpa, P.S. - Town Thana Chapra, District - Saran at Chapra 841301. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Jairam Singh Son of Late Mahatam Prasad Resident of Village Gheghata, P.S. - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present application in order to seek his remedy before the Court concerned which has granted regular bail to the Opposite Party No. 2. In view of the specific ground of violation of the conditions of bail granted by order dated 30.11.2024 passed in Bail Petition No. 2082 of 2024 in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 791 of 2022 wherein he was directed to be physically present on all dates and co-operate in the trial.
3. It has been specifically submitted that the Opposite
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6812 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 Party No. 2 has not been co-operating in the trial bearing Tr. No. 1304 of 2024 and, thus, it amounts to violation of the conditions of bail for which the desirable course would be to approach before the concerned Court which has granted the privilege of regular bail to the opposite party no.2.
4. In view of the same, the petitioner is granted liberty to move before the Court concerned and if a ground for violation of conditions is raised before the Court concerned, the Court would pass orders in accordance with law and would also ensure that no delay is caused in the trial on account of non-cooperation of the Opposite Party No. 2.
5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed off. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Vikash/- U T