Ranvir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29523 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2015 Thana -LAXMIPUR (Gidhour) District- JAMUI ====================================================== Ranvir Yadav Son of Brahmdeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Gadi Katauna, P.S.- Malaypur, District- Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.M.P.Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366 A of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner is to have kidnapped the grand daughter of the informant.
It is submitted that the informant is not the eye witness to the occurrence. The alleged victim has made statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has not made any allegation against the petitioner. She has stated that she had taken the petitioner to different places and also married with him. Learned Magistrate has also estimated her aged 17 1⁄2 years. The alleged victim is major. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29523 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui in Laxmipur (Gidhaur) P. S. Case No. 93 of 2015 with following conditions:-
1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T