Patna High CourtMJC/1923/2017disposed

Daresh Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-25Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1923 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7349 of 2017 =========================================================== Daresh Mukhiya, son of Srichand Mukhiya, resident of Village- Khairwa, Police Station- Bela, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar through the Special Secretary, Co-operative Department.

2. Bihar State Election Authority through its Secretary, 32 Harging Road, Patna800001.

3. Sri Birendra Paswan, Former District Co-operative Officer, Sitamarhi, at present posted as District Co-operative Officer, Aurangabad.

4. District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer, Sitamarhi.

5. District Co-operative Officer, Sitamarhi-cum-Deputy District Election Officer, Sitamarhi.

6. Block Development Officer, Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

7. Parihar Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti having its office at Parihar, DistrictSitamarhi through its Secretary, Thaga Sahni, son of Mangal Sahni

8. Thaga Sahni, son of Mangal Sahni, presently posted as Secretary, Parihar Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti having its office at Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

9. Upendra Sahni, son of Late Hajari Sahni, resident of Village- Dhami Tol, Police Station- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ============================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogendra Mishra with Mr. Arvind Kumar Jha, Advocates

Patna High Court MJC No.1923 of 2017 dt.25-07-2017 2/2 For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kr. Dubey, AC to AAG 11 For the BSEA :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents No. 7 and 8 :

Mr. Pashupati Pd. Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State; State Election Authority and respondents no. 7 and 8.

2. In view of materials brought on record, the Court does not consider that the matter requires to be kept pending.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off.

4. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law, with regard to any of his remaining grievances.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U