Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26041/2016bail granted

Wakil Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-08-31Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26041 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2015 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Wakil Singh, Son of Late Daroga Singh, Resident of Village- Delha, P.S. Muffasil Gaya, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The State of Bihar through Vigilance Department .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.L.Pandit(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition within course of the day.

Heard.

Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court taking note of this fact that he was allegedly caught red handed taking bribe.

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is in jail custody since 30.09.2015 and up till now only charge could be framed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future and, therefore, petitioner should be released on bail so

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26041 of 2016 (3) dt.31-08-2016 2/2 that he could defend himself in course of trial. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 36 of 2015 arising out of Vigilance P.S.Case No. 85 of 2015, subject to the condition that if the petitioner makes any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence and to terrorize the prosecution witnesses, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after due and proper inquiry. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T