← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9619/2017disposed

Radha Kant Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-09Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9619 of 2017 =========================================================== Radha Kant Choudhary, Son of Baikunth Choudhary, Resident of VillageSahasram, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director (Higher Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar.

5. The Vice- Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6. The Finance Controller, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

7. The Principal, Janta Koshi College, Biroul, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha and Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advcoates For the State :

Ms. Shilpa Singh, G.A. 12 Ms. Abhaujalli, A.C. to G.A. 12 For the L.N.M.U.University :

Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj and Mr. Jawed Gaffar Khan, Advocates =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and L.N. Mithila University.

2. In terms of the order dated 15.02.2018, supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents no. 4 and 5, in which it has been stated that payment of earned leave as well as G.P.F. has already been made to the petitioner. The said fact was

Patna High Court CWJC No.9619 of 2017 dt.09-03-2018 2/2 admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. In view thereof, the writ petition having served its purpose, stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U