← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5503/2019bail granted

Md. Quasim v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-31Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5503 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2017 Thana- RAIYAM District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Quasim, son of Md. Salim (name of father of Petitioner Md. Sabir wrongly mention in the Impugned Order), resident of Priharpur, P.S.- Rajnagar, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Raiyam P.S. Case No.48 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 392 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. There is no recovery from possession of the petitioner. No Test Identification Parade has been held. Name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused, Rajesh Kumar Sah. Counsel for State has submitted that there are seven cases pending against the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is mentioned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5503 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 in para 3 that petitioner is not named in those cases and he has been granted bail in all those cases.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Raiyam P.S. Case No.48 of 2017, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T