Sitaram Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8199 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Sitaram Rai Son of Late Saini Rai, Resident of Village + P.O.- Ghoghardiha, Police Station- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani, Pin Code847402, At present- Working as Pump Khalasi Udhbah Sinchai Yojna, Darhi, Minor Irrigation Sub- Division, Khagaria. 2.1. Razia Khatoon Wife of Late Md. Badruddin 2.2. Md. Yasin Son of Late Md. Badruddin 2.3. Md. Murtuja Son of Late Md. Badruddin 2.4. Md. Nadir Son of late Badruddin 2.5. Asmin Khatoon Daughter of Late Md. Badruddin 2.6. Shabnam Khatoon Daughter of Late Badruddin All resident of Village- Vishnupur Ashok, P.S. Shahpur kamal, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Begusarai. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Khagaria. 6.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Lakhisarai. 7.

The Assistant Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Khagaria. 8.

The Assistant Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Lakhisarai. 9.

The Junior Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Khagaria. 10.

The Superintendent Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bindhayachal Singh, Sr. Advocates Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to SC-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024 Heard Mr. Bindhayachal Singh, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.8199 of 2016(3) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move afresh in accordance with law and raise all issues including the rejection of the claim of the petitioner which was not the subject matter of the writ petition.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U