Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32708 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2014 Thana -CHARIABARIYARPUR DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Singh Son of Vinod Singh @ Binod Prasad Singh, R/o Village - Manjhaul Puwari Tola, P.s. - Cheriya Bariyarpur (Manjhaul O.P.), District - Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation when further statement of the informant was recorded he disclosed the name of the petitioner and others on suspicion that prior to the alleged occurrence an altercation has taken place between the deceased, petitioner and others. Further it has come that Gulten was brought in the clinic of Dr. Upendra by first information report

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32708 of 2015 (3) dt.09-11-2015 2/3 named accused Babua and some other and after that they left the clinic and in the next morning the dead body of Gulten and one other were found.

Submission is that besides suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner and similarly situated co-accused Bambam Kumar Singh has been allowed bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide Cri. Misc. No. 2536 of 2015 and other first information report named accused Deepak Singh has also been allowed bail by another coordinate bench of this Court as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration but the learned A.P.P. is not in position to distinguish the case of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Begusarai in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 203 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32708 of 2015 (3) dt.09-11-2015 3/3 without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) M.Rahman/- U T