Pushpa Kumari @ Pushpa Kunwar, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2052 of 2025 ====================================================== Pushpa Kumari @ Pushpa Kunwar, Wife of Late Jitendra Ram, Resident of Village- Bajen, P.O. and Police Station- Chandi (Kurnoul) District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, District- Bhojpur, Ara. 3.

The District Programme Officer (ICDS), District- Bhojpur, Ara. 4.

The Child Development Project Officer, Charpokhari Block, DistrictBhojpur. 5.

The Mahila Supervisor, Charpokhari Block, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay Government Advocate (05) Mr. Saurav Kumar, (A.C. to G.A.-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for respondents-State.

2. It is submitted by the petitioner that petitioner has applied for the post of Ananganwari Sahaiyka, Centre No. 31 of Babu Bandh Panchayat under Charpokhri Block in DistrictBhojpur in year 2018. Subsequently, she was selected for the aforesaid post on 09.06.2018 and given her joining as Aanganwadi Sahaiyaka in the office of Child Development Project under Charpokhri Block, District- Bhojpur on 27.11.2018. She also attended one day training on 24.11.2018 in the office of C.D.P.O. Her joining has been accepted by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2052 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 Mahila Supervisor of C.D.P.O Office, Charpokhri on 27.11.2018, since then she is working as Aanganwari Sahaiyka but she is not provided any honorarium or payment for her work for which she has already made various application before the respondent authorities but no decision has yet been taken.

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as further considering the documents annexed with the petition, it would be appropriate to dispose of the petition giving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent/competent authorities raising all grounds which she raised in this writ petition within two weeks from today and in turn the concerned authority is also directed to decide the same in accordance with relevant rules and law and shall pass a reasoned order probably within 45 days from the submission of said application. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) krishnakant/- U