Raj Kumar Mahto @ Rajkumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6999 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2022 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR MAHTO @ RAJKUMAR MAHTO Son of Late Dayali Mahto, R/V- Rampurwa, P.S- Govindganj, distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 422 of 2022, registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 448 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that on the order of Raju Mahto, he inflicted Farsa blow on the head of the brother of the informant.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is case and counter case. Both the parties have suffered injuries and the petitioner is under custody since 22.08.2022. The injury on the person of Akhilesh Kumar is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6999 of 2023(2) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 simple in nature.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 422 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T