Sheopujan Singh @ Dr. S.P. Singh v. Union Of India, Ministry Of Hrd And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.250 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19185 of 2015 =========================================================== Sheopujan Singh @ Dr. S. P. Singh, aged about 79 years, Son of Late Rameshwar Singh R/o Chitrakut Nagar Road No.3, P.O.- Digha, District Patna- 800012. ... .... Petitioner -Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India, Ministry of HRD (Department of Education) Shashtri Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001, Service through Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, 18 Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi- 110016.

2. Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) 18, Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi- 110016.

3. Dy. Commissioner (as was designated as Asstt. Commissioner) Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) Patna Region, P.O.- Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020.

4. State of Bihar through Secretary (Department of Secondary Education) Patna 800001.

5. Head Master, Umairabad High School, P.O.- Baidrabad, District- Arwal (Bihar).

6. Central Administrative Tribunal Patna Bench, Patna 88/A Shri Krishna Nagar, Patna- 800001 through Registrar CAT, Patna.

... ...Respondents-Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheopujan Singh @ Dr. S. P. Singh (In person) For Respondents : Mr. G. K. Agrawal, Advocate Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 26-09-2016 The applicant has sought review of the order passed by this Court on 21st of April, 2016 in C.W.J.C. No.19185 of 2015 by reagitating all the arguments which were raised and discussed in the

Patna High Court C. REV. No.250 of 2016 dt.26-09-2016 2/2 order under review.

We do not find any error apparent on record which may warrant review of the order passed. Consequently, the review application is dismissed.

The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order passed in review. We do not find that any substantial question of law as to interpretation of the Constitution arises for consideration for which the applicant can be granted leave in terms of Article 134A of the Constitution of India. The request for leave is thus declined. (Hemant Gupta, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 29.09.2016 Transmission Date