Mrityunjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5187 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2025 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Mrityunjay Kumar S/O Subhash Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Ramni, Ward No. 11, P.S- Murliganj, Distirct- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Wasi Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Rina Sinha, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is stated to have assaulted on the head of father of informant with iron rod.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. On account of long standing land dispute, a simple maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5187 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner and clean antecedents, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T