Shankar Singh v. Yogendra Prasad Sah And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.232 of 2016 ====================================================== Shankar Singh, son of Late Bhageru Singh, resident of MohallaRambhadra, P.O. Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Yogendra Prasad Sah , son of Harijuvan Sah

2. Baidyanath Prasad Sah, son of Late Mahavir Sah

3. Shambhu Sah, son of Maurilal Sah

4. Suresh Sah, son of Lalbabu Sah

5. Dinesh Sah, son of Late Beni Prasad Sah

6. Mantu Sah, son of Late Dwarika Sah

7. Pawan Sah, son of Late Dwarika Sah All residents of Mohalla- Rambhadra, P.O. Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali

8. Mahajani Devi, wife of Late Bhageru Singh

9. Shivji Singh, son of Late Bhageru Singh

10. Devanti Devi

11. Rajpatiya Devi

12. Malakh Devi

13. Sushila Devi

14. Sunita Devi, All daughters of Late Bhageru Singh

15. Dilip Singh, son of Late Nanhak Singh

16. Munewa Devi daughter of Late Nanhak Singh

17. Tota Singh

18. Suraj Singh

19. Chandrika Singh

20. Sanjay Singh, All sons of Late Dusit Singh

21. Dipnarayan Singh, son of Late Ram Ashish Singh

22. Munshi Singh

23. Bhola Singh, both sons of Late Yogendra Singh All residents of Mohalla-Rambhadra, P.O. Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali .... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard Sri Naresh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The present petition has been filed with a prayer to

Patna High Court C. REV. No.232 of 2016 (4) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 review/recall the order dated 07.05.2015 passed in C.W.J.C.No.17289 of 2010.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is settled that there is no restriction for the plaintiffs to examine their witnesses. However, on perusal of the order dated 07.05.2015 passed in C.W.J.C.No.17289 of 2010, it is evident that after hearing the parties and considering the facts and circumstances, this Court had dismissed the writ petition. Once, while exercising writ jurisdiction, this Court has rejected the same, there is no point for entertaining such petition for review/recall of my earlier order. It is not a case that there was a clerical or typographical error in the order.

The review petition is dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U