Raj Deo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5609 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2023 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1 .
Raj Deo Yadav S/o- Shri Ramji Yadav R/o village - Sonhan , P.s.- Keoti , District - Darbhanga 2.
Basudeo Yadav S/o- Shri Ramji Yadav R/o village - Sonhan , P.s.- Keoti , District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav , Advocate Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 323, 324, 341, 354 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code . 3 . The prosecution case in brief is that on 30.06.2023 at 2:30 P.M. informant was going to his house on his motorcycle . In the meantime, accused persons including these petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5609 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/3 assaulted informant as a result of which he sustained injury . Again on 01.07.2023, petitioners and co-accused persons and tried to damage the house of the informant. On protest, coaccused Ravindra Yadav inflicted 'farsa' blow on the head of mother of the informant, due to which, her head was also broken .
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case . It is further submitted that the FIR has been lodged after delay of ten days for which there is no explanation . Case and counter case . Both parties sustained injury . Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Injury allegedly caused by petitioner No. 2 is simple in nature . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition .
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedents of petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let this petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5609 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 3/3 Magistrate, 1st Class, Darbhanga in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 186 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS Act.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T