Md. Jakir @ Md. Zakir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8656 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Md. Jakir @ Md. Zakir Son of Late Id Mohammad R/o village - Loam, P.S.- Sadar, District - Darbhanga 2.
Md. Tamanna @ Tamana @ Tamna Son of Md. Jakir @ Md. Zakir R/o village - Loam, P.S.- Sadar, District - Darbhanga 3.
Md. Murtuza @ Md. Murturza Son of Late Phul Hassan @ Late Md. Pul Hasan @ Late Ful Hasan R/o village - Loam, P.S.- Sadar, District - Darbhanga 4.
Md. Munna @ Munna Son of Late Phul Hassah @ Late Md. Pul Hasan @ Late Ful Hasan R/o village - Loam, P.S.- Sadar, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate Ms. Nitu Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant with dagger and iron rod.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8656 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of long standing land dispute between the parties, maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8656 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 318 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T