Deepak Kumar Ram And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2141 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1537 Year-2016 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Deepak Kumar Ram son of Parikshan Ram 2.

Parikshan Ram Sukeshwar Ram Both are resident of vill-Kharsan,P.S-Riga, Distt.-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar and Anr Bihar 2.

Ram Pravesh Ram Late Laldhari Ram R/vill-Kamaldah, P.S-Bathnaha, Distt.-Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha (App 199) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.C1/1537 of 2016 dated 16.3.2016 arising out of Bathnaha P.S.Case no.13 of 2016, , registered for offences punishable under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the police after investigation has not found the case true, however, on protest the cognizance has been taken and the other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2141 of 2019(3) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 co-accused persons have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, vide order dated 6.4.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.19603 of 2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact and circumstances, as stated above, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 16.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.2141 of 2019 is affirmed.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T