Md. Firdaus Ansari @ Md. Firdaus Alam @ Md. Fardous v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4134 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
MD. FIRDAUS ANSARI @ MD. FIRDAUS ALAM @ MD. FARDOUS Son of Md. Rakim Ansari @ Md. Rakim Mian Resident of Village - Badahpur, P.S.- Mofassil, Dist.- Gaya.
2.
Taiba Khatoon W/o - Md. Firdaus Ansari @ Md. Firdaus Alam @ Md. Fardous Resident of Village - Badahpur, P.S.- Mofassil, Dist.- Gaya. 3.
Md. Rakim Ansari @ Md. Rakim Mian Son of Late Fahim Ansari Resident of Village - Badahpur, P.S.- Mofassil, Dist.- Gaya. 4.
Ladly Khatoon D/o Md. Rakim Ansari @ Md. Rakim Mian Resident of Village - Badahpur, P.S.- Mofassil, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Mofassil P.S. Case No. 462 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedents, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact there is land dispute between the parties and on account of the same these petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4134 of 2020(3) dt.04-09-2020 2/2 petitioner Nos. 2 and 4 happens to be lady and they have not committed any offence. Moreover, the petitioner No.3 happens to be an old man aged about 75 years and no specific allegation of assault attributed to him and only one injury has been found on the person of the injured and the same does not corroborate with the allegation levelled in the F.I.R. Moreover, the petitioner No.1 has already been taken into custody. Hence, the petitioners may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioners in the even of their arrest or surrender be released on bail on furnishing their personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Mofassil P.S. Case No.462 of 2019 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(1) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T