Jainath Yadav @ Jai Nath Yadav @ Jaynath Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6224 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2023 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Jainath Yadav @ Jai Nath Yadav @ Jaynath Kumar Yadav Son of Suraj Yadav @ Surya Yadaw Resident of Village- Dharam Parsa (Ahirtoli), P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 210/2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 309, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and 26 other accused persons are said to have brutally assaulted the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the post-mortem report does not support the prosecution case and if 27 persons assaulted the deceased a large number of injury should have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6224 of 2026(3) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 been caused to the deceased whereas the number of injuries caused to the deceased are only eight. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is accused of assaulting the deceased with a rod and a tractor was also used in killing the deceased but the post-mortem report does not support the prosecution. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj/concerned Court below in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 210/2023.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T