Soljar @ Soljar Tikulhara v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6980 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2022 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Soljar @ Soljar Tikulhara S/O Pramod Tiwari @ Pramod Tikulhara Resident Of Village- R.B.R. High School Rafiganj, P.S.- Rafiganj, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kajal Kumari W/O Soljar @ Soljar Tikulhara Resident Of Village- Srinagar Rafiganj, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad At Present D/O Pramod Tikulhara, R/O Devi Sthan, Obra, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 380, 323, 504, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6980 of 2023(4) dt.18-07-2023 2/2 her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 oppose the prayer for bail.

6. Opposite party no. 2, who is personally present before the Court, on the query, has stated that she will go with her husband after six months.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 312 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T