Satish Ray @ Satish Kumar Ray @ Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7283 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Satish Ray @ Satish Kumar Ray @ Satish Kumar S/O Nathu Ray Resident of Village - Chandpura Upendra P.S- Raghopur, Dist- Vaishali, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard Mr. Prakash Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 290 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 04.12.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted to the son of the informant due to which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per allegation in the F.I.R. the petitioner assaulted to the son of the informant namely, Manjan Kumar @

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7283 of 2025(3) dt.02-07-2025 2/3 Manjan Rai. Although, there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the son of the informant and son of the informant has received injury but the injury report of the son of the informant suggest that the injury is simple in nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 290 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7283 of 2025(3) dt.02-07-2025 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U