Anarwa Turiya v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22139 of 2016 (3) dt.04-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22139 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYA GRP CASE District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Anarwa Turiya son of Ramdeo Turiya, resident of Mohalla- Ambedkar Nagar Ward No. 25, P.S.- Tilaiya, District- Koderma .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. T.N. Thakur (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Koderma R.P.F. Case No. 14 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 3 of R. P. (U.P.) Act.

The petitioner is not named in the first information report and during investigation the petitioner was apprehended with two pieces of Joggle fish plates and four signal track relay and for that Koderma R.P.F. Case No. 17 of 2015 was registered. The petitioner confessed his guilt.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, he is in custody since 03.02.2016 and now he has sufficiently been penalized to which the learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22139 of 2016 (3) dt.04-07-2016 the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with R.P.F. Case No. 14 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T