Rina Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7702 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2023 Thana- Kurth District- Arwal ====================================================== Rina Devi Wife Of Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Resident Of VillageAnd Ps- Masaurhi, Distt- Patna Permanent Resident Of VillageNoniyarichak, Daulatpur, Ps- Masurhi, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lallu Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with her family members has tortured in various ways to the sister of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand and ultimately she was being killed by them.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is married Nanad of the deceased and she has been falsely implicated in this case only

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7702 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2 on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner was at her sasurali house, she was not present at place of occurrence. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not against his family members. Husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. The other co-accused namely, Sharda Devi @ Anita Devi who is mother-in-law of the deceased, has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 08.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86324 of 2023. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since 04.11.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Arwal in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 308 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T