Md. Affroj @ Mohammad Afroz Alam @ Afroz @ Md. Afroz Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13249 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Affroj @ Mohammad Afroz Alam @ Afroz @ Md. Afroz Alam S/o Md. Mobinul Haque @ Mobin Resident of Village- Charrapatti, Virnagar, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Paswan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Md. Anwar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case no.98 of 2024 registered under sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 325, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have entered the house of the petitioner and of having assaulted the informant and the members of his family. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the son of the informant with an iron rod leading to grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13249 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the FIR. There is no eyewitness to the occurrence and the petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial. He has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted the son of the informant with an iron rod causing grievous injury on his nose.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R. of having assaulted the son of the informant together with the corresponding grievous injury having been found on the nose of the son of the informant, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T