Shashi Bhushan Ray And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10680 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Shashi Bhushan Ray and Ors Son of Baidyanath Ray, Resident of Village and Post Officer-Madhopur, POlice Station-Siswan District-Siwan. 2.

Ravindra Ojha, Son of Late Chandra Prakash Ojha, Resident of VillageHussepur, Police Station-Ekma, District-Saran. 3.

Shailesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Sahab Singh, Resident of Machap, Police Station-Manjhi, District-Saran.

4.

Ravindra Tiwari, Son of Late Awadhesh Tiwari, Resident of Machap, Police Station-Manjhi, District-Saran.

5.

Ganesh Sah @ Ganesh Prasad , Son of Late Ram Bilash Singh, Resident of Karampur, Police Station-Ekma, District-Saran. 6.

Shatrughan Singh, Son of Late Kapil Dev Singh, Resident of Harpur, Police Station-Ekma, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Saran 3.

The District Board, Saran, Chapra through its Chief Executive Officer. 4.

The Chief Executive Officer Cum Deputy Development Commissioner, District Board, Saran, at Chapra.

5.

The National Hishway Authority of India through its Director, New Delhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Y.P. Sinha- Aag7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to move before the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad,

Patna High Court CWJC No.10680 of 2017(2) dt.14-03-2023 2/2 Saran, Chhapra, Bihar for making a representation with respect to his grievance.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U