Mustak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8286 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

Mustak Son Of Wazul Resident Of Village - Meshaudha, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar 2.

Pappu Son Of Tufail Resident Of Village - Meshaudha, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar 3.

Tetri Khatoon @ Nursana Wife Of Mustak Resident Of Village - Meshaudha, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar 4.

Rubaida Khatoon Wife Of Tufail Resident Of Village - Meshaudha, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Waliur Rahman For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 325 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant, his son by means of knife and lathi danda as a result of which they received injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the injury caused to Salam @ Aslam

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8286 of 2023(2) dt.17-04-2023 2/2 is simple in nature and informant sustained two injury, one is simple and another is dangerous to life. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that both the parties being agnate have settled their dispute outside the court and have filed compromise petition in the court below on 04.03.2023. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 190 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T