← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5294/2019bail granted

Ramashish Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-30Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5294 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2018 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ======================================================

1. Ramashish Singh, son of Late Yamuna Singh Resident of Village-Onama, P.S.- Shekhopur Sarai, District - Shekhpura

2. Suresh Singh Late Yamuna Singh Resident of Village-Onama, P.S.- Shekhopur Sarai, District - Shekhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No.84 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons having assaulted the father of the informant, on account of which father of the informant died subsequently during the course of the treatment. The main allegation as per the FIR of having given khanti/ iron rod blow on the father of the informant is against the co-accused, Gopal Singh, Sanjay Singh and Karnal Singh.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5294 of 2019(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the specific allegation is against the aforesaid co-accused persons, however, the entire family members of the accused side have been made accused in the present case. It is further submitted that final form has already been submitted as regards the family members of the accused side. It is submitted that no specific allegation of any sort of overtact has been levelled against the petitioners qua the deceased father of the informant. The petitioners have a clean antecedent and are languishing in custody since 06.10.2018.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the informant appeared and opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No.84 of 2018.

sanjeev/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U T