Md. Nasim v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30923 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2015 Thana -KRITYANAND NAGAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Md. Nasim Son of Md. Tahir R/o Village - Banbhag Mistritola, P.S. K. Nagar, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 18-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is of commission of theft from the mobile shop of the informant.

It is submitted that F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. During investigation co-accused Md. Appu was apprehended and on his confessional statement the name of the petitioner has appeared. The petitioner was apprehended with five mobiles which are alleged to have been stolen mobiles. It is further submitted that mobiles have not been put on T.I.P. Co-accused Md. Appu from whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner has appeared has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 29890 of 2015. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 3.4.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30923 of 2015 (2) dt.18-08-2015 2 / 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Shachi Misra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Purnea, in K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2015 with the following conditions :

1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4. In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/- U T