Chandan Saw @ Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4987 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Chandan Saw @ Chandan Kumar Son of Late Subodh Sah Resident of Village and P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar No.6, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No.423 of 2025 lodged on 09.06.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21(C), 22(C) & 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act pending before the Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, N.D.P.S., Banka.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against two named accused persons including the petitioner with allegation that there is recovery of 1400 intoxicate tablets and 154 pcs of intoxicate injection have been made from a shop, which is subject matter of the present case.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4987 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that on the alleged date of raid, shop of the petitioner was closed and he was not present at the place of occurrence.

5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there is one criminal case pending against him in which he is on bail.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and his antecedent is not clean.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T