Dhurb Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15941 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2020 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dhurb Raj S/O Jay Kishan Singh R/O Village- Bihat Gurdaspur, Ward No 20 Ps Barauni District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Prosecution case as lodged by the informant is that when he was returning with his sister on a bicycle, three persons on a Honda Shine motorcycle surrounded the sister of the informant by two sides and one Aditya Kumar made firing over the informant's sister due to which she sustained injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15941 of 2021(2) dt.12-01-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent, not named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner's name surfaces in the re-statement of the informant vide para-4 of the case diary. He submits that there is specific overt act against co-accused Aditya Kumar who made firing on the sister of the informant. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 294 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T